|
|
Post by Aedilus on May 19, 2005 19:42:39 GMT -5
You guys might be a fan of WWE, but I definitely am not.
In my opinion, WWE is not worth replacing star trek.
|
|
Alex
Fleet Admiral 
Posts: 643
|
Post by Alex on May 20, 2005 12:47:27 GMT -5
I like WWE but I like RAW much better than smackdown. They could have kept Enterprise as a lead in for Smackdown, or the other way around.
|
|
|
|
Post by Watson on May 20, 2005 13:42:14 GMT -5
Judgment Day looks good, esp. the mysterio match. sorry aedilus, but due to the deminishing fanbase of trekkies, and the falling popularity etc. i have absolutley no problem with wwe replacing it, and because it is more popular, it deserves to replace star trek.
|
|
Alex
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 643
|
Post by Alex on May 20, 2005 14:21:35 GMT -5
I am going to Judgment Day! Its in Minneapolis, MN! Close to my home town.
|
|
Nathan
Admiral
USS Defiant
"I am a graduate of Star Fleet Academy, I know many things." Lt. Commander Worf
Posts: 554
|
Post by Nathan on May 21, 2005 1:44:47 GMT -5
I enjoy wwe... but I wish they would talk a little less. Only real thing I have against it replacing Star Trek is that they didn't replace it somewhere else. As for Judgement day... cant wait to see JBL get it... and Eddie... I hope Ray beats him to a bloody pulp.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aedilus on May 21, 2005 11:34:34 GMT -5
I guess I'm in the minority here...  |
|
Nathan
Admiral
USS Defiant
"I am a graduate of Star Fleet Academy, I know many things." Lt. Commander Worf
Posts: 554
|
Post by Nathan on May 21, 2005 13:47:48 GMT -5
Sorry buddy.... At least we all agreed that we like Star Trek.
|
|
|
|
Post by blobbyboy on Jun 20, 2005 3:51:09 GMT -5
what?!?!?!? you want a load of guys jumping around in their pants on a bouncy stage rather than enterprise? i'm not a fanatic or anything, but couldn't wait for each new episode, i got into the characters after a few episodes and was hooked, i am quite annoyed they canned it after only running a short time, GRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!
|
|
|
|
Post by blobbyboy on Jun 20, 2005 3:53:19 GMT -5
ooooh, just thought, pants in U.S. are trousers, here in the U.K. pants are what you wear under the trousers! hope that clears up the great U.S. U.K. divide.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aedilus on Jun 20, 2005 19:50:39 GMT -5
ooooh, just thought, pants in U.S. are trousers, here in the U.K. pants are what you wear under the trousers! hope that clears up the great U.S. U.K. divide. That's really confusing. |
|
